Vivo V19 Review

Vivo V19 Review

Vivo V19

Since then Vivo seems to be a bit behind Is left The reason for this year's Vivo v19 is that I have it now. Being honest is not a trivial matter. However, there are some things that I like about it and there are many things that I wish we could have. Will improve the next iteration of Vivo's V-Series designs are not usually disappointing and it shares the same story that it has a glass back that looks good and has a good grip as well as a satisfying feel on the hands but the construction is questionable This is because it is surrounded by a plastic frame which can cause some stability problems in the long run. Also, all the buttons feel deprived and do not give satisfactory feedback, except in the back. The bump in the camera is huge and it may be a good case to slap if not taken care of. If you also do a case inside the box that can work for a few months, so far overall. Not much about its design. There's nothing awesome about it yet. In terms of comparisons, it's not bad at all. I think the Galaxy A71 steals the Vivo V19's Thunder with its good demeanor, but what a good label this device can definitely be. Its display is a 6.44-inch high-quality panel and the best thing about it is that it can be really bright as it is really an AMOLED display. It is also in a display and dark mode and About does not create a view. The theme is completely dark only partially dark in contrast to what Samsung has done so I would say I like to improve the process of Samsung but aside from the nap packing you can really I will get a good panel and anyone who needs a good display experience will definitely like v Vivo v19. One thing to display however is that the double punch hole is a kind of weird shape and is also slightly larger. Because it pushes the information from the right side to the left it oxidizes me that way but I only guess when we still talk about the display let's talk about the industry fingerprint sensor which is really fast and works well. It only fails to recognize your print when your hands are wet otherwise there are no complaints about it. In fact, I would prefer it over the 71 scanner which is a bit slow to my liking. Let's move on to performance and as I said. Initially, the Wave is lagging behind for some reason and one of the reasons is the choice of the chipset. It has the features of Snapdragon 712 that we see on the phone which is half the price. In terms of performance, the Vivo V19 looks at a significantly higher price, especially considering that its competitors offer much better value for a similar price when it comes to real-life performance. Snapdragon 712 is still a good set of chipsets, although they perform common tasks such as browsing the Internet using WhatsApp. Multi-tasking is not a problem as you won't notice any breaks in it either it provides gaming performance thanks to all the 8 GB of RAM however it has exceeded my expectations and because of this Assuming that Vivo has improved popular games like Pub and Call to run well, both the Galaxy A71 and Vivo V19 have a very similar gaming performance. When you keep the graphics smooth or in balance, you can go for both HD graphics and high frame rates and ultra frame rates in Pubg. v19 However with advanced Adreno 618 GPU and Snapdragon 730 you will definitely see better graphics quality on Galaxy A71 when compared to Vivo V19 so I also found the dedicated ultra game mode useful which Also built for an in-depth gaming experience. The game mode also has a feature that helps you to distinguish which direction it is going or which direction the bullets are being fired. If you're a pub player you might like what Vivo is offering here like other games like Duty of Call ran quite well, the Galaxy A71 and Vivo V19 can go in very high settings and In terms of graphics, it can go just as well again. The Galaxy A71 works better as the Vivo looks a bit sharper overall I like what the Vivo has done with the game match and with some matches the optimization can't help but compete but I think if Vivo had been better, Vivo would have been much better.

Let's take a look at the camera performance of this device that has a quad-camera setup on the back which has a 48-megapixel primary camera and an 8-megapixel ultra-wide-angle lens with a 2-megapixel web sensor on the front and a 2-megapixel macro lens. Regarding the performance of the primary rear camera in the megapixel primary and 8-megapixel secondary ultra-wide-angle lens, I will say that it is really as good as the difference in the pictures between these 71 is the ringtone because it looks like That is the yellow color of Vivo in your images too many times in accents it tends to make the images a little too orange. Most of the time when you get good results take the example of some of the patterns I shot they have a nice dynamic range with colors and enough details to give us a good picture. Extremely wide-angle images are also satisfactory. In addition to the a71, slightly better color and a wider field of theory, the v19's portraits are better on the a19 as well. Slightly better but Vivo is very close to the competition. In addition, what you find in Vivo has different lighting effects that you can apply to make your portrait even better. I even posted a picture on my Instagram account a few days ago using a monochrome background effect. I think it sounds just as cool if you are a person who likes to edit photos then there are various inbuilt filters and effects selfies. The v19 looks good but I found them a bit more elegant even in normal mode but your skin looks a bit lighter but the selfies look nice however the Galaxy A71 selfies do a better job of maintaining the background exposure. While you can see that the v19 will focus entirely on this topic, only the quality of the v19 selfie is equal to that of the a71 although you get a lot of filters and sticker options if you're in this type of stuff. The front also has a wide-angle lens that can be really handy when you're taking group photos, but the quality isn't as good as the primary, as you get the option to shoot up to 4 4k 30 fps video. 4K videos and 1080p 60 videos are not stable so S only works in 1080p 30fps videos Colors and details look good on all resolutions even though you have an ultra-stable mode which makes your videos a bit more stable But this option is only available there. 1080p 30fps option Overall the cameras on Vivo V19 has very good performance however considering the price it would be. It would have been better if the company had provided telephone lenses and optical image stabilization here instead of macro lenses because the macro lens is performing poorly but one complaint I have with Vivo is that the camera UI here is a bit The problem is that for those who are not accustomed to this interface, it can be a bit difficult to operate. For example, you have to click on the lens option to shoot wide-angle images. If I want to go back you have to go through what I think is a bit more complicated as well as there are two options for clicking on portrait images that can be simplified and it's not just the camera that has a touch The overall OS interface is not perfect. To get the settings you have to drag the taskbar twice and as mentioned earlier the dark mode is not completely in the dark but finally, Vivo has heard the complaints and immediately toggles the menu. Has been placed at the top and Vivo's digital assistant Joy has also been improved which I really like is its amazing view feature that gives you health and usage statistics like drinking water or about With information on how long you will be using your phone in the future, I hope Vivo will pay more attention to aspects of its UI usage. Makes it better for its customers to have a seamless experience.